Captain's Report
Thames Valley Division 1
5 October 2010
Ealing A 4.5 - 3.5 Surbiton A
Board
|
Colour
|
Ealing
A
|
Score
|
Surbiton
A
|
Score
|
1
|
W
|
Richard McMichael
|
0.5
|
Mark Josse
|
0.5
|
2
|
B
|
Alan Perkins
|
0.5
|
Stefano Bruzzi
|
0.5
|
3
|
W
|
Adrian Ociepka
|
1
|
Paul Shepherd
|
0
|
4
|
B
|
John Quinn
|
0
|
Ian Henderson
|
1
|
5
|
W
|
Veljko
Stanisic
|
0.5
|
Angus James
|
0.5
|
6
|
B
|
Martin Smith
|
1
|
Heiko
Cassens
|
0
|
7
|
W
|
David Ebbett
|
1
|
Rob Harrison
|
0
|
8
|
B
|
Randolf
Bruin
|
0
|
Michael Nightingale
|
1
|
Fixtures in Thames Valley Division 1 don’t come
any tougher than away to the Champions. Last season we got a 6-2 duffing up in the corresponding fixture. With our normal
Boards 1 (Chris) and 3 (Nick) not available the challenge was made even greater.
However, a number of our players’ gradings have been on
an upward trajectory recently and so we travelled to Ealing in a hopeful frame
of mind.
It was no surprise to find us out-graded on
every board (their average ECF rating was 192 vs our
average of 172). This statistically suggested a 2.5-5.5 scoreline
against us. We bettered the rating stats but, regrettably, the match has gone
despite a hard and valiant fight by the team.
I am indebted to Mark Josse
for providing comments on the individual games which I have supplemented where
I can. I regret I spent most of the session trying unsuccessfully to solve the
problems at my own board so had little opportunity to browse!
Board 1 Richard McMichael- Mark Josse
Mark’s opponent played 1
b3 and Black played a reversed Sicilian type position, which is typical of
this line, and equalized out of the opening fairly easily. The middle game
looked like it might be interesting, with the two
sides attacking on opposite flanks and maybe a slight initiative for Mark, but
the position quickly fizzled out leaving bishops of opposite colours. Whilst this is often a strong attacking force in
the middle game both kings were secure and a draw agreed. A solid draw by Mark against a strong player. Well done.
Board 2 Stef
Bruzzi – Alan Perkins
This started off as a
Sicilian Taimanov system. The middlegame followed with Stef
playing on the Kingside and Black on the Queenside targeting the c4
square. A flurry of tactics ensued in amongst which Stef
reports that he missed a win. Instead Black ended up the exchange to the good
but White had two dangerous pawns on the d and b files which, coupled with
the Bishop, meant the endgame would have been a fairly comfortable draw,
which was duly agreed. Good effort by Stef, unlucky
not to win.
Board 3 Adrian Ociepka – Paul Shepherd
Your captain had Black vs the dangerous Adrian
(196) who played a sharp line vs
the Modern involving h4 and an early 0-0-0. Black equalized out of the opening
and could have got interesting play with …b4 at the right moment. Instead Black
played Ne5 prematurely and allowed White a nasty pin. Black missed a chance on
the 18th move to tactically extricate himself and made a serious
error on the 19th move which left White with all the chances. Black was
eventually forced to play f6 to ease the pressure from the pin on the Ne5. This
left the light squares around the Black King fatally weakened and I resigned
with a mating attack about to follow. The opening was fine but insufficient
tactical vision led to a disappointing defeat for the skipper.
Board 4 Ian Henderson – John
Quinn
Ian as White played down a main
line Kings Indian and a full blooded battle ensued with the usual King vs Queen side play. White seemed to be getting the upper
hand positionally, as is the norm for the KID, but
the position was unclear with Black having counter play. The position may have
been swinging back to Black but, in the end, White had various pieces for the Black
Queen, which had to be returned leaving a minor piece ending where White
is a pawn up. White had a dangerous Queenside pawn majority which looked like
it should give good winning chances. John resigned without resuming. Well
played Ian.
Board 5 Veljko
Stanisic – Angus James
The opening was a KID and White
managed to get in g4 in a favourable way to close the
Kingside. In the latter stages Angus had to be precise and placed his Knight
and Bishop well to support pawns on e5 and c5 and also combined that with
threats to invade on the Kingside. White repelled this fairly well by
positioning his pieces around the King and may have had a slight
edge. Black did not seem to have any real difficulties and, with both
sides unable to improve their positions that much, a draw was agreed. Well
played Angus against a much higher graded opponent.
Board 6 Heiko
Cassens – Martin Smith
Quite early in the opening Heiko’s King ended up on d2 with Queens
still on which meant he had to conduct a rearguard action. Heiko
defended valiantly and entered a double Rook ending a pawn down. Crucially
the White King was cut off and a pair of rooks was exchanged. Black had a
mobile pawn majority which he pushed. Heiko fought
hard and created a passed pawn of his own on the f file but the Black King and
pawns were just too strong on the Queenside. Martin avoided a couple of
nasty tricks that were set and played the ending well to bring Ealing the full point. Although he went down Heiko never stopped fighting hard right to the end.
Unlucky!
Board 7 David Ebbett
– Rob Harrison
Rob as Black came up against the
dreaded Slav exchange. White played 7 Ne5, which is probably his strongest move
at this point. Black did not seem to have any difficulties entering
the middle game but interestingly for this line White castled Queenside
and Black Kingside which meant for some fun ahead. For a long time Rob’s
position looked good, if not plain better. However, Rob fell into a nasty
discovered check and, faced with the loss of his Queen, duly
resigned. It seemed Black needed to play ...Qb6 to get out of this prior
to the tactic. White would have still had an edge with his strong e pawn and
the light square control from a2 to g8 although Black would still have had all
to play for with Nc7 to b5 ideas and attack on the white Queenside in return.
Bad luck for Rob who played a good game and was up against a much higher graded
opponent.
Board 8 Michael Nightingale – Randolf Bruin
Right from the off the tactics
fizzed around this game and, after a bright start for White in the opening, where
he unseated the Black King to f7, Black fought back and was probably on his way
to winning in the late middle game. Michael fought hard and whipped up
some Kingside threats with his Queen and Knight whilst Black destroyed White’s Queenside.
Michael played Re3xe5 which left his Queen en prise
on h6 to the Black queen at d2. This was overlooked by Black who played ... Be4
and Michael then stole the Black Queen and with it the game! Well done
to Michael for continuing to cause his opponent problems which contributed
to the swindle and to Randolf for the good spirit in
which defeat was accepted.
Considering that, based on gradings, only our top two boards would have got into the Ealing team, we put up a strong fight and should take
confidence in our ability to compete from this into the rest of the season.
Next up for us in this competition is home vs Harrow on October 27th
Paul Shepherd 5 October
2010
|